Transcript for Paul Hellyer’s Speech at the Citizen Hearing on Disclosure

Transcript is based on this video (also embedded above):  

http://vimeo.com/65430488

I welcome your corrections and clarifications.  The question marks indicate places where I didn’t catch what he was saying. Also, I’ve enlarged and bolded the parts I found interesting. 

—-START OF TRANSCRIPT—-

Congressman Merrill Cook: 

Let’s go to our esteemed Honorable Paul Hellyer of Canada. We would give you 20 minutes sir. 

Paul Hellyer: 

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. And thank you for giving me this opportunity to speak. And thank you Steve for the invitation. 

My name as I said was Paul Hellyer. I’m a former Minister of National Defence for Canada. I served in three governments during a total of twenty-three and a half years as a member of Parliament. As a minister of National Defence, I had sighting reports of UFOs. I was too busy to be concerned about them at the time because I was trying to unify the Army, Navy, and Air Force into a single Canadian defence force, and that itself was a kind of battle, to finish. So this was not high on my agenda. 

But about ten years ago, I started getting interested due to a young man in Ottawa sending me material on the subject. I told him I was too busy to read it but he had confidence that someday I would. He sent me a copy of Colonel Corso’s book, The Day After Roswell. It took me a while to get around to reading it but I took it for my summer reading in 2005 and was really impressed with what was contained in it. 

And what I thought to myself is there are huge issues here, huge issues. And the American people and the people of the world have a right to know what’s going on. Because they’re part of it. It’s not just an isolated thing. And so after confirming the contents of the book with a retired United States Air Force general, I accepted the invitation of Victor Viggiani who’s over here somewhere  (gestures) and his cohort Mike Bird to speak to a symposium at the University of Toronto. And I said, UFOs are as real as the airplanes flying overhead. That gave me the dubious distinction of being the first person of Cabinet rank in the G8 group of countries to say so unequivocally.  (Applause)

Since then I have learned a lot from many sources, including a number of the fantastic witnesses that we have heard these last four days. They were so outstanding I was just really just blown away with the amount of information that was available, and I appreciate every single one of them. But because I’m not a UFOologist, I’m a politician, there are only a few things I want to add in that particular realm. 

First is that about in the 1960s there was a flotilla of UFOs headed south and crossed into NATO territory in Europe and the Commander in Chief of the Supreme Allied Headquarters in Europe was naturally very shaken. Fortunately, or maybe [by] Divine Providence, before the panic button was pushed the flotilla turned around and headed back north. Obviously they had thought maybe they were rushing and they were very concerned about it. Anyway, an investigation was launched into this whole subject and a document was prepared which concluded that at least four species had been visiting Earth for thousands of years. And this is my own view at this stage as well. 

So, except for that, there are just a couple of things we’ve talked about that I’d like to refer to. 

And one was that we were referring to them as “they” until this morning when Linda Bolt-Howell actually named three different species. I have brought my latest book called Light at the End of the Tunnel: The Survival Plan for the Human Species as an aide memoire. And I named five different species here. I’m aware of more now. As a matter of fact, I saw a document just a few days ago that mentioned twenty, and I think you Mr. Chairman were interested in the some of the places they might come from. And I have in here Zeta Reticuli, the Pleiades, Orion, and Romeda, and the Altera?? Star Systems. So I don’t think we can anymore refer to them as “they” because they are not an amorphous mass. They are different species and consequently may have different agendas. I don’t think we can say that they all have the same agenda any more than we can say that the United States, China, and Russia have the same agenda. Our real interests may be very similar but as of now our perceived interests are still quite far apart. 

One more observation before I begin what I want to say. And that is that we spent quite a lot of time talking about the six-year-old cadavers, and I was glad to have Linda this morning finally say that there are live ETs on Earth at this present time. And at least two of them probably working with the United States government. I believe some of the other species that I learned about not too long ago was called the Tall Whites. And this was when Paula Harris broke the story just a few years ago. And through her good offices I had the chance to talk for about three hours with former Airman Charles Hall, and listened to this absolutely fascinating story of how he was working with, first of all, he was scared out of his skin, but after that, when he got to know them, how he was working with and finally they became [sic] to trust each other and had a good working relationship with the Tall Whites. At the Gunnery Range in Indian Springs, Nevada, these Tall Whites were living on United States Air Force property. And working in cooperation with the United States Air Force and sharing technology with them. He wrote a book incidentally called Millennial Hospitality. There are four different versions but  Paula says Millennial Hospitality no. 2 is the best. I think that’s the one I read and it’s a very interesting read if you sort of want to get inside the problem of what it’s like to bump into these people floating across the terrain, in the desert. 

Enough on that for now. My interest is in full disclosure. My own ?? is  I would say 95 to 98% full disclosure. I know of one or two things that I’m not sure should be in the public domain, at least yet. It would be someday I’m sure but not maybe immediately. But just as children survive the idea of the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus when they become adult, I think that tax-paying citizens are quite capable of accepting the new and broader reality that we live in a cosmos teeming with life of various sorts. The fact that some other civilizations are more advanced than we are may be humbling. But that could be a necessary step in our survival. 

The world is an unholy mess. We have at best until the end of this decade. In my book I said we have ten years to stop global warming if we don’t want it to be beyond the point of no return. Two years have gone past since it was written so I say we have until the end of the decade to arrest global warming. Yet our leaders don’t even talk about it very much except in a superficial way. They appear to be more interested in starting wars to control more oil and in effect prolong the gravity of the effect. Of course even if they took the problem seriously they wouldn’t have the finances to finance the transition from oil to clean energy because we have an infinitely silly banking and financial system in the Western world. [Applause]

And the United States Congress I regret to say is partly responsible and I’d be glad to elaborate on that later if you’re interested. 

And finally, they need the technology for clean energy. It exists, and is being kept secret by the same vested interests that control our destiny. Who are these vested interests? And what are they up to? Well, Senator, you were talking about a military ???. In my opinion that is true but I have broadened and deepened the definition to “cabal”. And the cabal comprises members of the Three Sisters, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, and the Trilateral Commission, international banking cartel, the oil cartel, members of various intelligence organizations, and select members of the military junta (?), who together have become a shadow government of not only the United States but of much of the Western world. The Council on Foreign Relations is the oldest of the Three Sisters and as early as October 1940, years before Germany surrendered to the Allied Armies and to vaporize Hitler’s vision of empire, the Council’s Economic and Financial group drafted a memorandum outlining a comprehensive policy: 

“To set for the political, military, territorial and economic requirements of the United States and its political potential leadership of the non-German world, including the United Kingdom itself as well as the Western hemisphere and the Far East.” 

[Reading from book] The Council made absolutely no effort to disguise the fact that the purpose of the grand area, and later world, hegemony was to support an expanding US economy, to provide it with raw materials and markets for its products. This was labeled the “national interest”. It was equally clear that the “national interest” was the interest of the ruling elite, whose members comprise the Council. The real interests of rank and file Americans was never a factor in the equation. 

Mr. David Rockefeller was a member of all three of the Sisters. He is quoted as saying this at a meeting of the Bilderbergers in Europe: 

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. A supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practice of the past centuries.” 

He of course pretended he didn’t say that but the witness as reported by Daniel Estulin, a thoroughly reliable reporter who has written the true story of the Bilderberger Group, and if you want to really get inside of what’s been going on there for this long time, that’s a good place to go. 

So anyway, you hear what Mr. Rockefeller said and so there you have it. The aim of the game is a world government comprising members of a cabal who are elected by no one and accountable to no one. And according to Mr. Rockefeller, the plan is well advanced. 

Does this help you to understand why our civil rights are being taken away from us? I say “us” because ??? is included in the grand plan. A giant leap in the wrong direction followed the end of the Cold War. 

[Reads from book]  No one could have been happier than I was when the Berlin Wall came down on November the 9th, 1989. The elation on our side of the curtain was near universal and very significant on the other side as one country after another regained its freedom. Nearly everyone believed that it was the dawn of a new era of peace and prosperity for people everywhere. There was much talk of a peace dividend. The prospects were dazzling, dazzling in their scope and diversity. It was a unique and god-given opportunity for a new braver and fairer world. 

We blew it. We blew the chance of a lifetime to do good things. A small group of zealots undermined our golden opportunity to pursue peace, not war, and little did we dream that they had a vastly different vision of the new world order. Their plan, which is now commonly known as The Project for A New American Century included preventive wars in clear violation of international law, regime change wherever and whenever the U.S. desires, and if they can get away with it without excessive casualties, the establishment of a kind of economic and cultural hegemony with America acting as “constabulary” (that was their word) globally.  

This was to be accomplished without authority of the United Nations and without the restrain of existing international treaties. It would involve a military buildup unprecedented in peacetime history. It could trigger an arms race which is precisely the opposite of the peace dividend that the world had rightly looked forward to. The machiavellian scheme involved secret police, the curtailment of civil liberties, defiance of the U.S. constitution, and a moribund economy, operating way below its potential. Exactly those features for which the Soviet Union was held in contempt. 

The initial draft of the document was so controversial when it was leaked in the New York Times that it had to be rewritten, but it was not changed very much, just cosmetics. Enough to make it politically acceptable. 

The document said this. [Reads from book]  While it may have been easy to persuade President Bush to abandon his stated policy of not getting America more deeply involved in international affairs, persuading the American people would be more difficult. Sophisticated Americans would question such a giant sea change in policy. The authors of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses, Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century” recognized this difficulty from the outset because their document contained the following sentence: “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary changes, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.” And it wasn’t too long before they got their catastrophic and catalyzing event. Terrorists struck the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon in Washington on September the 11th, 2011 [sic]. 

Incidentally they have removed the sentence about Pearl Harbor in the document that you can now look at if you went to the Internet to find it. 

[Reads from book] Almost the whole world mourned. ???, the overwhelming majority of Muslims condemned the treacherous attacks. My sympathy for the friends and families of the injured and the dead was genuine and unwavering to this day. My sympathy for the U.S. government began to grow a bit thin however when I heard President Bush cite the reasons for the attack.  “Why do they hate us?” he asked rhetorically in an address to the Congress. “They hate what they see right here in this chamber, democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms, our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.”  

I felt sad when I heard the President’s words. I assumed that he believed what he was saying. But if that were true, he was profoundly ignorant of the real thoughts and feelings of people in other parts of the world. If he wanted to hear the truth, he should have listened to Osama Bin Ladin, who was well-informed concerning the origins of the kinds of fanatical hatred of the United States which has led to such treachery. 

This is his version of events: “Every Muslim must rise to defend his religion. The wind of faith is blowing and the wind of change is blowing to remove evil from the peninsula of Muhammed. Peace be upon Him. As to America, I say to you and its people a few words: I swear to God that America will not live in peace before peace reigns in Palestine and before all the army of infidels depart the land of Muhammed. Peace be upon Him.” 

That is clear enough. The dislike of America has nothing to do with democracy versus dictatorship, or wealth, or freedom of religion, or freedom of assembly. It’s directly related to American foot-dragging and stick-handling (?) a just settlement of the Palestinian Question. 

Congressman Merrill Cook: 

Mr. Hellyer, I hate to interrupt. The time has expired. But I’m very happy if the panel has no objection to allow another minute or two to finish your statement. How much time do you think you need to finish? 

Paul Hellyer: 

I think probably somewhere between one and five minutes, at most. 

Congressman Merrill Cook: 


I think we’ll give you two minutes to finish your statement as much as I’d like to grant more. Thank you. 

Paul Hellyer: 

Okay. [Reads from book]  In short, American foreign policy was the root of the conflict. 

So here we are more than a decade later fighting another war that can’t be won. There’s no country on Earth powerful enough to protect its citizens against fanatical hate, as we learned from the Boston Marathon. The mere attempt to pursue the impossible pits neighbor against neighbor and the state power structure against everyone. All of the freedoms won by the millions of men and women who fought and died in World War II are being flushed unceremoniously down the drain. 

The only hope of peace is to negotiate a settlement. This will require a paradigm shift in American attitudes. It involves a de facto renunciation of the plan for a New American Energy and the adoption of a pledge of cooperation with all humankind to build the kind of world which we are collectively capable of. Young people everywhere need to be challenged by a noble cause. They need to be involved in arresting global warming, creating a banking system that is just and sustainable, and lead the way in the transformation to the new reality, that we have to live in harmony with our celestial neighbors, as well as seeking peace on Earth. [Applause]

In a word, we have to become spiritual beings and practice the one tenet that the world’s major religions have in common, and that is the Golden Rule. … This is from the late Dr. John Mack, an American secular Jewish psychiatrist who became a world leader in interviewing abductees or “experiencers” as he called them. 

I came to this conclusion in a startling book, Passport to the Cosmos

[Reads from book]  “Although the aliens are not themselves gods—their behavior is sometimes anything but godlike—abductees consistently report that the beings seem closer to the Godhead than we are, acting as messengers, guardian spirits, or angels, intermediaries between us and the Divine Source.”   

Thank you.  [Applause] 

 

—END OF TRANSCRIPT—

  1. anarchaqueer reblogged this from jenwa8
  2. shootingsmack reblogged this from jenwa8
  3. jenwa8 posted this
Blog comments powered by Disqus